Everything, Everything

2025: January February March April
2024: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2023: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2022: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2021: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2020: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2019: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2018: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2017: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2016: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2015: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2014: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2013: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2012: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2011: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2010: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2009: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2008: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2007: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2006: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2005: J F M A M J J A S O N D
2004: J F M A M J J A S O N D
Atom 1.0 vs RSS 2.0
Saturday 2nd December, 2006 14:06 Comments: 1
I've been looking into RSS 2.0 and XHTML as I want to dump the XHTML output into the RSS 2.0 feed, just like I do with my Atom 1.0 feed, but it seems that RSS 2.0 is a bit crap, to put it bluntly. Other people have written good comparisons of the two formats, and I'm fairly certain that Atom is a much better choice. This means I won't bother rewriting my RSS 2.0 feeds, if you want the full content then use the Atom 1.0 feed. Sorry, but it's not my fault that RSS 2.0 sucks.
Avatar Yamahito - Monday 4th December, 2006 09:31
Trillian seems to be happy with the Atom feed, so no complaints from this direction
© Robert Nicholls 2002-2025
The views and opinions expressed on this site do not represent the views of my employer.
HTML5 / CSS3